By invitation The manuscript PDF is circulated to the reviewers I have written to and sits behind a password; I am asking that it go no further. This site is deliberately open, so that the sources and grades can be checked without it. The book is not published and nothing here is for sale.

Sleep. Eat. Exercise.

A manuscript, open to invited reviewers

Eighty-five pages: sleep, food and training, then the situations they show up in, and what to do when a number looks wrong. Almost every claim is traced back to the document it rests on. Most of those sources carry a grade for how good they are; guidelines and background reading carry a label instead. Where a claim has no source behind it, the book says so on the page.

If you are a reviewer, start here

The system map from page 6: seven nodes across sleep, nutrition and exercise, joined by twelve numbered pathways, four drawn solid and eight dashed.
Page 6. Twelve pathways across the system. Four reach Established or above and are drawn solid, and the other eight are drawn dashed.

Clinicians and researchers

Which reader are you?

I am not asking anyone to read all 85 pages. Each request names a specific set of pages, and those pages are the ask. Two optional extras are set out on the reviewer page, and both are skippable. If I have written to you, one of the two routes below is yours. Take whichever one describes you.

Both routes go to the same address, review@sleepeatexercisebook.com. If you are comfortable with it I would like to thank you by name in the acknowledgments, and I ask before anyone is listed. What being thanked will and will not mean.

What it is

A short list, not a long book

The book covers sleep, food and training for a general reader, in 85 pages. It keeps what the evidence supports, grades most of the sources it keeps, and says plainly where a number is a working rule rather than a trial result. It is deliberately short, so it carries two risks: compression, where a claim squeezed into one line ends up stronger than the study behind it, and omission, where a caution that should be on a page is missing. Those are what I am asking you to check.

  • Nothing for sale
  • No consumer launch
  • Not yet published
  • Corrections still open
The method

Why you could believe any of it

Because the method is the credential. Almost every claim is traced to a source, whether a study, a guideline or a label, and most of them carry a grade. Where the evidence is thin, the book says so. Where a number is a working rule rather than a trial result, the book says that too.

  • 85pages
  • 107on the evidence scale
  • 4grades, plus two labels
  • 12mapped pathways
How the 138 source entries break down A bar chart of the 138 entries. Strong, 9. Established, 13. Moderate, 42. Emerging, 43. Guideline, 28. Background, 3, ungraded. Strong 9 Established 13 Moderate 42 Emerging 43 Guideline 28 Background 3, ungraded
Strong 9, Established 13, Moderate 42, Emerging 43, Guideline 28, Background 3. The two largest groups are Moderate and Emerging, and the book says so on the page rather than dressing it up. The rubric is my own. It was informed by how GRADE thinks about certainty, but it rates each source rather than a body of evidence, so it is not GRADE and should not be read as it.
What earns each grade
GradeWhat earns it
StrongMeta-analysis or systematic review of randomized trials, large enough to settle the direction, or a pre-registered replication across many laboratories.
EstablishedAt least one well-conducted randomized trial, or evidence settled enough that the direction is not in dispute.
ModerateProspective cohorts, a systematic review of studies that are not randomized trials, or more than one trial where the samples are small, the durations short or the outcomes stand-ins.
EmergingCross-sectional or mechanistic work, animal studies, or one small trial standing on its own.
GuidelineA clinical body, a regulator or a formulary sets the rule, and the book says which one. This is a kind of source, not a rung on the scale: guidelines rest on evidence of their own, which I have not re-graded.
BackgroundReading that informs the argument without being a study, so it carries no grade.
What is in it

Three pillars, one system

The book treats sleep, food and training as one loop rather than three separate lists, because that is how the evidence behaves. Twelve pathways connect them.

  • Sleep. Where to start

    A fixed wake time, morning light, caffeine and alcohol timing, and what each stage of the night does. Pages 13 to 23.

  • Eat. The fuel

    Protein and plants, the six nutrients it focuses on, fiber, and the gut as something you feed rather than test. Pages 24 to 34.

  • Exercise. The engine

    Strength, an easy aerobic base, a little hard work, balance, and where recovery happens. Pages 35 to 44.

The shape of the book across 85 pages Eight parts drawn to scale along the length of the book. Front matter, pages 1 to 12. Sleep, 13 to 23. Eat, 24 to 34. Exercise, 35 to 44. Data and support, 45 to 49. Making it stick, 50 to 53. The situations, 54 to 67. The back matter, 68 to 85. Front matter 1 to 12 Sleep 13 to 23 Eat 24 to 34 Exercise 35 to 44 Data, support 45 to 49 Making it stick 50 to 53 The situations 54 to 67 Back matter 68 to 85 Warning signs, pages 69 and 70. Sources, from page 77.
Each bar sits where that part sits in the book and is drawn to its true length. Front matter 1 to 12, Sleep 13 to 23, Eat 24 to 34, Exercise 35 to 44, Data and support 45 to 49, Making it stick 50 to 53, The situations 54 to 67, the back matter 68 to 85. The system map is on page 6, the grade rubric on page 9, the warning signs on pages 69 and 70, and the source list runs from page 77.
The conflict

Where I sit, and where that might show

I am Chris Ngoi. I am not a doctor and I am not a researcher. What is here is my best-effort reading of the studies I could find, which is why the method has to be the credential rather than the author, and why a correction from you is worth more than anything I can add.

I am in the wellness industry, so I have an interest in the same space this book covers. Read all of it knowing that.

The book does not recommend or feature any company or product, mine or anyone else's. Where a name appears it is a source being cited, because a medicines label is sometimes the only source there is. What it covers is what the published evidence says about the basics worth getting right before anything else. The support chapter sits behind a screen designed to talk you out of most of it. Wherever a free basic does the job, the book says to do that instead.

What the book contains is my reading of the published evidence on the basics worth getting right before anything else, graded, with the gaps marked. If a grade anywhere looks generous to you, say so and I will take it seriously.

Before you use any of it

This is information, not medical advice

Nothing in the book or on this site was written about you, because I do not know your history, your medicines or your conditions. It is not a substitute for a doctor, a pharmacist or a nurse, and reading it does not put you in anyone's care.

Do not start, stop or change a medicine because of anything here. Where the book says something needs adjusting, that is a question to put to whoever prescribes for you. If anything here contradicts what your own clinician has told you, they are right and the book is wrong.

Do not delay care because of anything you read. If something worries you, get it looked at. Thresholds, doses, what is available on prescription and what you are obliged to report all differ by country, so use the figure that applies where you live. The book is written for adults, and the disclaimer that governs every page is on page 2.

The full terms, and how this site handles your data.